Mining Learning
PT·EN·ES
ResearchIntermediate

An Australian university wants to fix mining's biggest data waste: the data nobody uses

Mining Learning Editorial Agent August 6, 2026 5 minutes read
An Australian university wants to fix mining's biggest data waste: the data nobody uses

The University of Queensland has installed a state-of-the-art mineral analyzer to research how to turn geological data generated across a mine's life into better decisions — not just archived reports.

30-second read
  • The University of Queensland (UQ) has installed a TESCAN Integrated Mineral Analyser (TIMA) at its natural resources characterization hub, NRICH.
  • The equipment will support geologist Pia Lois-Morales's research on integrating geological data generated across the different stages of a mine's life.
  • The research is funded by an Evolution Mining fellowship — a sign that miners are willing to pay to solve this data bottleneck.
What happened

The University of Queensland (UQ), in Australia, has installed a TESCAN Integrated Mineral Analyser (TIMA) at its Natural Resources Innovation and Characterisation Hub (NRICH). The instrument, which measures mineral composition, grain size and mineral liberation with high precision, will support the research of Pia Lois-Morales, a geologist specializing in geometallurgy and the inaugural recipient of the Jim Askew Evolution Mining Fellowship at UQ's Sustainable Minerals Institute.

What we learned

The problem this research tackles isn't a lack of data — it's the opposite. According to Lois-Morales, a deposit's geological characteristics are collected and generated at practically every stage of the mining value chain, from exploration to processing, which makes geology one of the industry's richest sources of information. The bottleneck is structural: equipment like TIMA already exists in industry, but there it operates under pressure to deliver immediate operational decisions, with no time to explore the full potential of the data it generates. Having the same equipment inside an academic setting, without that shift-by-shift pressure, opens room to investigate how to collect better data, refine data-treatment workflows and, above all, test how to integrate datasets that today stay siloed between geology, mining and processing — work that day-to-day operations simply don't have time to do.

Why it matters

Every mine accumulates, over decades, an enormous volume of geological data that rarely crosses the boundary between the team that collected it and the team that decides, in processing or mine planning, what to do with that ore. Closing that gap without relying on more sensors or more drill holes — just using what already exists better — is the kind of gain any mature operation, with decades of data sitting in the archive, can replicate once the method is validated.

What did we learn?

  • The biggest geological data bottleneck in a mine usually isn't a lack of collection — it's the boundary between whoever collects it and whoever decides.
  • An academic setting, without the pressure of immediate operational decisions, is where it becomes more feasible to test how to integrate datasets that day-to-day mine routine keeps siloed.
  • Miners are directly funding applied geometallurgy research through fellowships, not just through internal R&D departments.

Skills Radar

  • Geometallurgy
  • Data Science
  • Research and Innovation

Skills Developed

  • Geometallurgy
  • Data Science
  • Research and Innovation

Upward trend

Miners are increasingly willing to fund applied academic research in geometallurgy and data integration, seeking operational gains that don't depend on more sensing capex.

Who is this content useful for?

  • Geologists
  • Data scientists
  • Researchers
  • Process engineers

To go deeper on this topic

Worth pursuing training in:

  • Geometallurgy
  • Data science applied to mining
  • Economic geology
Sources: