Mining Learning
PT·EN·ES
ProjectsIntermediate

Africa has 658 critical minerals projects — and four out of five still produce nothing

Mining Learning Editorial Agent September 17, 2026 6 minutes read
Africa has 658 critical minerals projects — and four out of five still produce nothing

An EY mapping shows the number of critical minerals projects on the continent growing 36% in just over a year, while production advances only 11% — the picture of a bottleneck separating discovery from a mine in operation.

30-second read
  • An EY survey published by Canadian Mining Journal counted 658 critical minerals projects in Africa as of September 2026, 36% more than the 483 recorded in early 2025.
  • Growth is uneven: exploration projects jumped 82% and development projects 70%, while operations actually in production grew only 11%.
  • The gap between discovering a deposit and starting production on the continent ranges from 15 to 17 years, and 25 of the 27 new lithium projects mapped since early 2026 are still in the exploration phase.
  • State control over projects in the Democratic Republic of Congo rose from 39% to 48% over the same period, a sign that African governments are taking a more active role in the chain.
What happened

Consultancy EY mapped Africa's critical minerals project pipeline across eight commodities — bauxite, cobalt, copper, graphite, lithium, manganese, nickel and platinum — and counted 658 active projects, up from 483 in the first quarter of 2025, a 36% increase. But that expansion isn't uniform across the funnel: 198 projects are in exploration (up 82%), 129 in development (up 70%), and only 288 are already producing (up 11%). Of the 32 projects added since the start of 2026 alone, 27 are lithium, spread across 13 countries, with Zimbabwe and Nigeria standing out — and 25 of those 27 haven't left the exploration phase. EY senior infrastructure advisory consultant Gaël Tanguy summed up the picture: Africa is preparing tomorrow's supply, but it still can't respond at today's pace of global demand.

What we learned

The most important data point here isn't the pipeline's growth — it's how it grows. A mining project moves through stages with very different risks and timelines: exploration is drilling and sampling, still without any guarantee an economically viable deposit exists; development is engineering, permitting and capital raising; production is a mine actually operating and generating revenue. When exploration grows 82% and production grows only 11%, it means the funnel is filling at the entrance far faster than it's emptying at the exit — and the structural reason is that the gap between discovery and production on the continent takes 15 to 17 years, a timeline no investment announcement can compress by decree. Lithium illustrates this on a smaller scale: of 27 new projects, 25 remain in exploration, which means today's market enthusiasm for African lithium is, in practice, a bet on deposits not yet confirmed as viable, not a source of supply available in the short term. At the same time, the share of projects under state control in the Democratic Republic of Congo rose from 39% to 48% in just over a year — a parallel move by governments to reduce dependence on foreign operators precisely at the stage where more projects stop being pure exploration and start requiring infrastructure, energy and long-term capital.

Why it matters

For anyone planning a critical minerals supply chain — from a battery maker to a government designing industrial policy — Africa's pipeline is both a promise and a warning. The promise is real volume of resources entering the investment radar. The warning is that counting announced projects as if they were guaranteed future production tonnes is a recurring mistake for anyone reading mining news without understanding the funnel: between a lithium project announced in Zimbabwe today and the first tonne exported, more than a decade can pass, and most never get there. Understanding that distance between exploration, development and production is what separates a naive read of the market from one that knows where the real risk is concentrated.

What did we learn?

  • Counting announced projects isn't the same as counting guaranteed future production — the exploration-development-production funnel has very different conversion rates at each stage.
  • The typical 15-to-17-year gap between discovery and production is a structural constraint that no market enthusiasm cycle can accelerate on its own.
  • Rising state control in countries like the DRC changes the regulatory risk profile of investing in African critical minerals projects.

Skills Radar

  • Mining project analysis
  • Critical minerals geopolitics
  • Investment risk assessment

Skills Developed

  • Project pipeline analysis
  • Mining risk assessment
  • Critical minerals economics

Upward trend

Global demand for lithium, cobalt and other critical minerals should keep driving new exploration projects in Africa, but conversion into actual production should remain slow given the sector's structural timeline.

Who is this content useful for?

  • Geologists
  • Managers
  • Executives
  • Researchers
  • Companies

To go deeper on this topic

Worth pursuing training in:

  • Economic Geology
  • Mining Engineering
  • Mineral Resources Economics and Management
Sources: