Canada takes 20 years to open a mine. Australia takes 14
A PwC report shows the permitting time gap between the two countries now weighs more than geology when it comes to attracting capital for critical minerals.
- The Mine 2026 report, by PwC Canada, shows that opening a mine in the country takes an average of 20 years, versus 14 in Australia.
- The six-year gap already weighs on investor decisions as much as the quality of the mineral deposit.
- Five projects deemed of national interest by the Canadian government total CAD 11 billion in capital stuck waiting for approval.
The Mine 2026 report, by PwC Canada, cross-referenced data from S&P Global Market Intelligence and arrived at a number that embarrassed the sector: a mining project takes an average of 20 years between discovery and start of operation in Canada, versus 14 years in Australia.
The difference isn't in geology — Canada has world-class critical minerals deposits, as good as Australia's. It's in the regulatory architecture: overlapping federal and provincial assessments, no defined deadlines for decisions, infrastructure bottlenecks, and Indigenous community consultation processes that drag on without a single point of contact. The report lists five projects now classified as of national interest by the Canadian government, totaling CAD 11 billion in capital stuck waiting for a decision. The lesson for anyone structuring projects is direct: permitting time has become a financial engineering variable as much as ore grade or cost of capital.
In the global race for critical minerals, no country competes alone on the strength of its own geology. Investors compare jurisdictions by the time until the first concentrate leaves the plant, and every year of delay is one more year of capital parked without return. For project managers and investors, understanding a country's regulatory design is now part of technical due diligence, not just legal due diligence.
What did we learn?
- Permitting time is now as relevant a competitiveness factor as deposit quality.
- Overlapping jurisdictions and undefined deadlines cost billions in parked capital, not just schedule delay.
- Assessing a jurisdiction's regulatory design has become part of the technical due diligence of a mining project.
Skills Radar
- Mineral Economics★★★★★
- Project Management★★★★★
- Market★★★★★
Skills Developed
- Mineral Economics
- Project Management
- Market
Stable trend
Permitting regulatory reforms move slowly because they involve multiple levels of government — the bottleneck tends to persist in the short term, even with political pressure to speed up.
Who is this content useful for?
- Project managers
- Investors
- Executives
- Companies
To go deeper on this topic
Worth pursuing training in:
- Mineral economics
- Project management
- Governance and compliance
- Environmental management and permitting


