The US opened a pilot plant to turn Idaho antimony into ammunition
Perpetua Resources, the US Army and Idaho National Laboratory opened a modular pilot plant to turn ore from the Stibnite Gold project into military-grade antimony trisulfide. It's the first concrete step to reduce US dependence on China and Russia for this mineral.
- Perpetua Resources, the US Army and Idaho National Laboratory opened, on July 29, 2026, a modular pilot plant in Idaho Falls to process antimony from the Stibnite Gold project into military-grade antimony trisulfide.
- The processed material is used to make ammunition and other specialized military and industrial applications — China stopped supplying military-grade antimony trisulfide to the US in 2021.
- Since 2022, the US government has already invested $87 million in the Stibnite project, combining funds from the Defense Production Act, the Defense Ordnance Technology Consortium and a direct agreement with the Army.
- Stibnite is today the only identified antimony reserve on US soil — and already supplied the US with antimony and tungsten during World War II.
Perpetua Resources, the US Army and Idaho National Laboratory (INL) opened, on July 29, 2026, a modular mineral processing pilot plant in Idaho Falls. The unit processes ore samples trucked in from the Stibnite Gold project in central Idaho — a district that already supplied the United States with antimony and tungsten during World War II and today holds the only identified antimony reserve on US soil. The stated goal is to demonstrate, at small scale, domestic production of military-grade antimony trisulfide, used to manufacture ammunition and other specialized industrial applications.
Rebuilding a critical mineral supply chain from scratch rarely starts with a commercial-scale refinery — it starts with a pilot plant small enough to prove the metallurgy works before any larger capital commitment. That's exactly the role of the Idaho Falls unit: validate whether Stibnite antimony can be refined to the purity grade required for military applications, before any decision on building industrial-scale capacity. The funding behind the project also teaches something about how the US government builds this kind of strategic bet today: instead of a single funding line, the $87 million invested in Stibnite since 2022 comes from distinct sources stacked together — $59 million from the Defense Production Act, Title III, an additional award from the Defense Ordnance Technology Consortium, and $27 million directly from the Army through an ordnance technology initiative agreement. It's a mosaic of public funding instruments, each designed for a different stage of project maturity, not a single check. There's also a lesson about what exactly counts as a critical mineral in practice: it's not raw antimony that matters here, it's a very specific chemical form of it — military-grade antimony trisulfide — that China stopped supplying to the United States in 2021. Strategic vulnerability often lives at that level of specificity in the final product, not in the generic availability of the raw material.
The Stibnite case works as a replicable model for any country that needs to reduce external dependence on a strategic mineral without unlimited capital: identify the existing domestic reserve, validate the metallurgy at pilot scale funded by multiple public programs, and only then move to commercial scale. For anyone evaluating a career or investment in mineral processing in the United States, the plant's modular design — built to be reconfigured and test other critical mineral processing flowsheets — also signals where the next wave of government-funded pilot projects is likely to appear.
What did we learn?
- Rebuilding a critical mineral supply chain usually starts with a small pilot plant, not a commercial refinery — the initial goal is to prove the metallurgy, not to produce at volume.
- US public funding for strategic minerals combines multiple stacked instruments — the Defense Production Act, defense consortiums, direct agreements with the armed forces — rather than a single source.
- Critical mineral vulnerability often lies in a specific chemical form of the final product, not in the generic availability of the raw material.
Skills Radar
- Critical Minerals★★★★★
- Mineral Processing★★★★★
- Strategic Resource Policy★★★★★
Skills Developed
- Critical Minerals
- Mineral Processing
- Strategic Resource Policy
Upward trend
China's 2021 halt of military-grade antimony trisulfide supply and growing federal investment since then indicate that domestic processing of this mineral should keep expanding in the coming years.
Who is this content useful for?
- Mining Engineers
- Researchers
- Managers
- Executives
- Students
To go deeper on this topic
Worth pursuing training in:
- Mineral Processing
- Extractive Metallurgy
- Mineral Resource Policy


